Find: Amazon wants to disrupt again: a costless, contractless phone

What? Amazon disrupt?

*** 
 
 
// published on Ars Technica // visit site

Report: Amazon wants to offer a phone for free, without a contract

Amazon has plans to release a smartphone that customers can get for the price of free, with or even without a contract, according to an article from former Wall Street Journal reporter and editor Jessica Lessin. Lessin writes that an internal source at Amazon confirmed that the company has been in touch with wireless carriers about offering such a phone.

"The free strategy isn’t set in stone," says Lessin, but if Amazon could pull it off, it would be offering something its competitors don’t: freedom from contracts, without a price premium. Lessin was unclear on whether Amazon would require anything of its customers, such as a subscription to Amazon Prime.

Of course, offering a phone that doesn’t cost the hundreds of dollars off-contract that popular models like the iPhone and Samsung Galaxy S 4 do is not the hard part; making that phone decent is. Furthermore, the draw of a contract-free existence wouldn’t mean much if the phone were not compatible with most of the major carriers. Simply being able to swap between AT&T and T-Mobile wouldn’t mean as much as being able to swap between all five of the biggest carriers without a second thought.

Read 1 remaining paragraphs

Find: google sidesteps carriers and oems to reduce fragmentation


 
 
// published on Ars Technica // visit sit

Balky carriers and slow OEMs step aside: Google is defragging Android
Ron Amadeo

Android 4.3 was released to Nexus devices a little over a month ago, but, as is usual with Android updates, it's taking much longer to roll out the general public. Right now, a little over six percent of Android users have the latest version. And if you pay attention to the various Android forums out there, you may have noticed something: no one cares.

4.3's headline features are a new camera UI, restricted user profiles, and support for new versions of Bluetooth and OpenGL ES. Other than the camera, these are all extremely dull, low-level enhancements. It's not that Google is out of ideas, or the Android team is slowing down. Google has purposefully made every effort to make Android OS updates as boring as possible.

Why make boring updates? Because getting Samsung and the other OEMs to actually update their devices to the latest version of Android is extremely difficult. By the time the OEMs get the new version, port their skins over, ship a build to carriers, and the carriers finally push out the OTA update, many months pass. If the device isn't popular enough, this process doesn't happen at all. Updating a phone is a massive project involving several companies, none of which seem to be very committed to the process or in much of a hurry to get it done.

Read 11 remaining paragraphs